Having Very Little Can Mean Having It Very Good
March 11th, 2008by Stacey DeWitt
Our children were out for Spring Break last week. As we headed to the beach, I looked through our bookshelf to find something inspiring to read and landed on a book called, The Measure of a Man, a spiritual autobiography by Sidney Poitier. I had purchased it a few months earlier since Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967) has always been my favorite movie and To Sir with Love and A Patch of Blue rank in my top five. Given Poitier’s great body of creative work, I thought he might have something to say on the spiritual side. Turns out, I was right. The book is excellent, but more importantly, I made a profound connection with Poitier’s message.
As CEO of Connect with Kids, I often speak on the topic of "Affluenza" to parents, teachers, and students. And as I read Poitier’s book, I was fascinated by the fact that an African-American man – who is more than 30 years my senior, who was born in the Bahamas and endured the prejudice of the 40s, 50s and 60s, and who has had a world experience far different than my own –provided validation for the very philosophy we promote in our presentations and programs at Connect with Kids.
I found myself asking, “What do we have in common? How is it that Sidney Poitier and I — worlds apart — have come to the same conclusion? After some reflection, the answer surfaced.
At a young age, both Sidney Poitier and I learned the value of poverty. Although we came to that understanding in a different time, from a different race, a different generation, and on different corners of the planet, we both had families that left a legacy of the significant value of commitment, discipline, and character rather than mere pleasure. He and I both understood as small children before either of us could tell you why, that as Poitier put it “by having very little, I had it very good.”
He learned directly by experiencing that poverty as a young child. I, a generation younger, learned indirectly through the legacy of my parents who made sure that even though I was raised in a fairly cushy, white, middle-class environment the lessons they learned in harder economic times were not lost on me.
But Poitier, far more accomplished than I, says it in a way that touched my soul. It bears repeating. So here is a taste of what Poitier has to say about building character in an affluent, pleasure-seeking society, which I hope will whet your appetite enough to find the book and read it in full.
In talking about his own parents, Poitier writes:
"Reggie Poitier (Sydney Poitier’s father) knew what his legacy would be. He knew and believed in the importance of his role as a father, and he knew that it extended well beyond his capacity as a breadwinner. He believed in the responsibility and the dignity of his task as a bearer of standards and as an enforcer of standards and he wouldn’t let his relative position in the economic hierarchy of a crazy tourist economy in any way belittle that role. . . The fact is you can’t do that kind of parenting if your values aren’t clear to you in terms of your own life. You can’t be passing on to your kids a strong foundation if you don’t have one yourself, because whatever foundation you do or don’t have –that’s what you’re going to pass on. And when we pass on something that doesn’t serve our children, we have to be responsible for that."
Regarding the subtle shift in values over a series of generations, Poitier writes (and I am paraphrasing) that as early as the 1940s, those coming back from the war were doing a lot of pleasure chasing due to explosive economic prosperity. It was then that the pleasure principle was introduced. The war generation of the 40s was responsible for the children of the 60s — who by that time had been so indulged that it caused, for the first time in history, a "distortion of the curve in values." Sex, drugs and rock ‘n roll (mind-blowing experiences at the time) — in Poitier’s opinion — were simply a more extreme outgrowth of the same hedonism that began in the explosive economy following the war. And, as prosperity and pleasure-seeking matures, values can continue to erode.
How do we change the tide? Poitier offers this: "Focus on and examine people who are making enduring commitments." He talks about famous people such as Nelson Mandela … but he also talks about simple people, including his mother, who got up every day before the sun to wash dishes and scrub clothes by candle light and who never had an indoor toilet. Poitier notes that his mother found satisfaction in her commitments and in the discipline of hard work because she had never been introduced to the pleasure principle.
He writes: "Dirt poor . . . I inherited such a legacy, and I pity the kids today who are being raised in such a way that they will be hard-pressed to enjoy the simple things . . . to endure the long commitments and to find true meaning in their lives. Poverty didn’t kill my soul. Poverty can destroy a person, yes, but I have seen prosperity kill many a soul as well."
Poitier notes that when children have a sense of pulling their own weight and contributing to the family, they take pride in that contribution and "learn responsibility and discipline through meaningful work."
In my opinion, Poitier is spot on. It seems that if we can teach children the value of service, the deep satisfaction one can derive from discipline and commitment, then we will go a long way toward building character. Those values are different from the competitive values that are paramount today. Commitment to service and to work that is critical for interdependence is not the same as a commitment to make a certain grade or win a certain trophy in order to receive external accolades. It’s difficult to teach that kind of commitment and discipline in an affluent environment that values instant gratification, consumerism, ego and pleasure seeking. But, if we can create smaller interdependent environments at home and at school – environments that offer a counter-perspective through things like simple chores and clear standards –it’s possible a balance will emerge.
That’s our message at Connect with Kids and our goal in the talks we give to kids and parents and the shows we produce about "Affluenza." Economic prosperity, in and of itself, is neither good nor bad. But the values it can produce will weaken the next generation if we don’t counteract that which instantly gratifies with that which provides substance and endurance through the promotion of commitment, discipline and delayed gratification.
At Connect with Kids, we don’t pretend to have all the answers. We only hope that raising the issue will at least begin a dialogue within individual communities so that those responsible for the children in their care will think about the legacy they leave to those children.
To all of the schools that have invited Connect with Kids to speak, I thank you for the opportunity to participate with your children, parents and faculty. I hope you will continue to find helpful information on our website, in our programs and through our presentations. And thanks for indulging me and taking a minute to read the blog.

Got a camper?
